As anticipated, Britain has started welcoming back the Islamic State (ISIS) jihadists – male and female, thus paving the path for those notorious radical Islamic terrorists in spreading Islamist jihad in the country. According to British tabloid the SUN, an ISIS bride, who was allowed to return to the United Kingdom calls children murdered in the Manchester Arena attack “victims of war”.
Samia Hussein (25), who joined the Islamic State in 2015 and later was smuggled out of Syria in early 2020 was allowed to fly to Heathrow via Turkey in February.
Victims of war? A war between whom? Radical Islam and Britain? Taking the above statement of ISIS bride Samia Hussein, one may definitely express gravest dismay as these jihadists may at any time wage “jihad” against the non-Muslim Britons, those radical Muslims consider as “enemies of Allah”.
Few weeks ago, a member of Al Qaeda has returned to Britain and since then been allowed to freely move on the streets of England.
In Samia Hussein’s case, she was detained on suspicion of membership of a banned organization, under Section 11 of the Terrorism Act 2000. But, when asked by The Sun whether she had been charged for joining a terror group [ISIS], the Hole Office said they could “not confirm or deny” the extremist’s status for “national security” reasons.
Alan Duncan (53), an ex-British soldier who interviewed the jihadist bride in 2019 slammed the British government’s lack of transparency after Samia Hussein told him on camera that she had joined Islamic State after seeing their “sick propaganda” videos online.
In the same videoed interview, Samia refused to condemn the sadistic bombing of a pop concert at Manchester Arena in 2017 which claimed the lives of 22 innocent people – including ten youngsters aged under 20.
When Alan Duncan asked her if she had a message to families of the victims of Manchester Arena attack, the ISIS bride compared the terror attack and beheading of foreign aid workers to coalition attacks on the evil caliphate.
Mark Hodge, commenting on the case of Samia Hussein and British authority’s unwillingness in disclosing information about charges brought against her, wrote:
This is no surprise. The Home Office some time ago banned Martin Sellner, Brittany Pettibone, Lauren Southern and Lutz Bachmann from entering, all for the crime of opposing jihad terror and Sharia oppression, and thereby made it clear that it is more authoritarian and unwilling to uphold the freedom of speech than ever – at least when it comes to criticism of Islam, Muslim rape gangs, and mass Muslim migration.
The bannings of Sellner, Pettibone, Southern, and Bachmann were just part of a long pattern. Pamela Geller and I were banned in 2013, apparently for life, also for the crime of telling the truth about Islam and jihad. Just days after Geller and I were banned, the British government admitted Saudi Sheikh Mohammed al-Arefe. Al-Arefe has said: “Devotion to jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls, and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer. Allah said that if a man fights the infidels, the infidels will be unable to prepare to fight.”
Britain’s past record of appeasing radical Islamic individuals
Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri, a notorious preacher known for spreading religious hatred and jihadist madness – although was banned from speaking in Pakistan was whole-heartedly welcomed by the UK Home Office into Britain.
The UK Home Office had also admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into Britain, despite the fact that he has said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the easiest. Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth – tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination of the above”.
Similarly, Manchester jihad mass murderer Salman Abedi trained with a jihad group in Libya, and traveled in and out of UK with no problem.
According to The Sun, then British Prime Minister Theresa May’s relentlessly appeasement-minded government also admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Meanwhile, the UK banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted from entering the country. The asylum application of a Christian family facing a death fatwa in Pakistan was three times rejected. But an ISIS bride was let back in and given a taxpayer-funded house, despite the fact that she has an ISIS flag on her Twitter account. No terror charges for her, of course.
Unfortunately, the British authorities, in its abject pursuit of support from its rapidly growing Muslim population, have long ago left behind any commitment to basic human decency or protecting rest of its population from the possible notoriety or terrorist acts of radical Islam. On the other hand, London being the capital of dirty money has wholeheartedly welcome few individuals with jihadist links in dumping millions of dollars as well as buying immigrant status under the controversial Golden Visa program.