King Charles tried to stage a palace coup against Queen Elizabeth II

0

King Charles who is accused of destroying his married life with Princess Diana for the reason of him giving priority to his then mistress Camilla Parker Bowels and allegations of Britain’s current king of receiving dirty cash from suspicious individuals is not facing a new allegation of attempting a palace coup during 1990s with the ulterior goal of ousting his mother Queen Elizabeth II from the throne.

According to British newspaper The Sunday Times, in the new episodes of ‘The Crown’ which is scheduled to be released on Netflix, there is a scene where Charles suggests replacing his mother – Queen Elizabeth.

The fifth season of “The Crown” includes a scene where Charles suggests he’s prepared to replace Queen Elizabeth II while she was still alive, The Sunday Times reported.

Season five of “The Crown” hits Netflix on November 9 and will focus on plotlines involving the royal family in the 1990s.

Events viewers can expect to see dramatized include Princess Diana’s tell-all interview with the BBC and the Queen’s infamous “annus horribilis” – a phrase she used to describe the turbulence the royals faced in 1992 with the collapse of several marriages and the Windsor Castle fire.

According to The Sunday Times, the upcoming season of “The Crown” includes an episode where Charles holds a secret meeting with then-prime minister John Major pitching himself as a replacement for the Queen. The newspaper reports that, in the scene, Charles asks Major whether he believes the monarch is “in safe hands”.

Buckingham Palace has long denied claims that the Queen planned to step down while she was alive.

Hundreds of people are commenting on this bombshell information on social media platforms and newspaper sites. Here are few of the comments:

Gayle: I vaguely remember some talk about this way back when. And the queen let it be known she was not stepping down.

Jackie: I have always thought that Elizabeth was hanging on just to prevent Charles from becoming king. She knows her son better than any of us.

Gina: Well Will wanted to replace his dad, so did Andrew. So what’s the point. England take note. It’s not up to other nations to preserve your nonsense. People, whatever their titles, are people. If you don’t like our shows, don’t watch. And wait a canned minute. Shakespeare was doing this same thing centuries ago. Go fish!

Barth: I don’t know where you get the impression that the royals have ever married for love. It was and has always been about convenience. Charles was required to get married to produce an heir, and that’s exactly what he did. Yes he is 73 but he is the heir to the throne and queen does not have the power to bypass him to give it to William. It would take a special act of Parliament that even the queen was not ready to get into. Charles couldn’t have simply abdicated, either. It is wishful thinking to think after waiting all these time, he wouldn’t want to be king.

John: Commonwealth is fragmenting, by the time William ascends it will be no more. He will be a well-heeled, spokesperson for worthy causes and no more. The Church of England was founded by an adulterer and will end with one, Karmically appropriate, don’t you think?

Jessica: Can you imagine having a lock on a job worth millions, only to be strung along for 50 years hearing “Not yet, but soon…” ? Then, when you’re 8 years past your own retirement date, you finally get the call? Of course he wanted to replace her, it’s what they prepared him for and it should have happened at the latest when she turned 70. Not the right man for the job? Then that’s the principal problem of a royalty system, isn’t it?

Richard: Time to wake up Brits. It’s not the 1600’s anymore. You don’t need a monarchy to function.

Bob: Charles seems to have been an uneventful young man always seeking his very own identity. I never saw any quality in him that displayed a uniquely admirable talent. Perhaps he was overly protected in his upbringing. As an older man, his designation as a royal does not seem that of a true royal.

Rothman: Harry’s memoir will shed light on a lot of things Chucky Rex did. That’s why Chucky Rex and the rest of the Royal Klan are up in arms about it.

Monica: That’s not news. Everyone knew that but the Queen knew Charles is not the brightest bulb in the pack so she decided to punish him for his errant behavior.

Dennis: Mummy would never have allowed Prince Chuckie to ascend while she was alive.

Howard: What I don’t understand is that why did the Britain have female monarch(s), to begin with? I mean, it is the sons who continue the bloodline and carry the last name of the family, NOT daughters because daughters get married, take their husband’s last name, and give birth to his children, who are from a different bloodline! Besides, it is the United Kingdom, NOT the United Queendom! If a King doesn’t have a son, then the throne should go to his brother, or nephew, or another closest male relative from, his father’s bloodline!

Sebastian: Dominic West (AKA Jimmy from The Wire) is a good choice. He’ll make Charles look like a jerk.

Pamela: They all say this, as she was in her 70s on the press kept going will the Queen retire as some European royalty had. Press filler.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here