Connect with us

Resolution in the US Congress and threats posed by radical Islamic groups in Bangladesh


Resolution in the US Congress and threats posed by radical Islamic groups in Bangladesh

Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury

Congressman Jim Banks (Republican-Indiana) and Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (Democrat-Hawaii) well deserve my personal gratitude and thanks for introducing House Resolution 1156 in the United States Congress on November 20, 2018 expressing concern about the threat posed to democracy and the democratic process by theocratic groups operating in Bangladesh. This bipartisan bill focuses on the poisonous behavior of the Jamaat-e-Islami, Islami Chhatra Shibir, Hefajat e Islam and other extremist groups in South Asia. Among other things this resolution calls on the government of Bangladesh to stop radical organizations, such as Jamaat-e-Islami, who pose an ongoing threat to the country’s stability and secular democracy, and for USAID and the State Department to halt all partnerships with groups affiliated with these extremist movements.

What is Jamaat e Islami?

Jamaat-e-Islami is an influential and dangerous Islamist group with a long history of violence. It front groups raise millions of dollars and hire lobbyists in the Capitol.

On January 1, 2018, President Trump tweeted that Pakistan gives “safe haven to the terrorists.” The State Department subsequently suspended over a billion dollars of security assistance and military funding to the country. The suspension of this aid is both welcome and long overdue. For decades, elements within Pakistan’s government have openly supported America’s most virulent enemies, including funding and training the Afghani Taliban and sheltering Osama bin Laden. Today, the country continues to provide support and sanctuary for the perpetrators of terrorist attacks against the U.S. and its allies. But if the Trump administration is determined to cripple Pakistan’s support for Islamist terror, it cannot limit its focus to South Asia; it must also confront Pakistan’s Islamist proxies in the U.S.

One of the most important Islamist networks running America’s Muslim communities today is Jamaat-e-Islami (JI). Founded in British India in 1941 by the prominent Islamist theorist Abul Ala Maududi, JI maintains branches in dozens of countries across the globe. In 1971, JI terrorists helped Pakistani forces murder hundreds of thousands of Bangladeshis fighting for freedom from Pakistani rule. In the decades since, Jamaat e Islami has been complicit in violence across the subcontinent. As a result, the U.S. government has designated the head of JI’s paramilitary wing in Pakistan and Kashmir, Syed Salahuddin, as a “global terrorist.”

Exposing Jamaat e Islami:

According to research conducted by the Middle East Forum, despite JI’s violence, its front groups in America have flourished — enjoying partnerships with government, praise from politicians and journalists, and funding from prominent charitable foundations.

One of the most important American JI organizations is an international aid charity named Helping Hand for Relief and Development (HHRD). Founded in 2005, HHRD was annually raising an astonishing $40 million by 2015.

HHRD is openly connected to terror. In December 2017, HHRD organized a conference at a government-run college in the Pakistani city of Timergara. Other organizations sponsoring the event included the Falah-e-Insaniat Foundation and the Milli Muslim League, the charitable and political wings respectively of the notorious Pakistani terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba. In 2016, the U.S. government designated the Falah-e-Insaniat Foundation as a terrorist organization. Today Hafiz Saeed, the leader of Lashkar-e-Taiba and the mastermind behind the deadly 2008 Mumbai attacks, lives freely in Pakistan, despite a $10 million U.S. bounty.

When HHRD is not meeting with designated terrorist organizations, it can usually be found partnering with JI charities that are also closely linked to terrorism. Another sponsor of the HHRD conference in December was a Pakistani charity named Al-Khidmat, which is the main charitable wing of JI. According to the Indian BBC journalist Subir Bhaumik, Al-Khidmat “aids militancy and helps to support the Hizb-ul-Mujahideen, Jamaat’s armed wing and other groups.” In 2006, JI announced that Al-Khidmat sent 6 million rupees ($100,000) to Hamas for their “just Jihad.” HHRD is currently working with Al-Khidmat on a number of projects.

But HHRD is not just connected to JI through charitable partnerships and conferences. A look at HHRD’s American staff and officials reveals that they openly identify as JI operatives.

Mohsin Ansari, for example, is the chairman of HHRD. He is an alumnus of Islami Jamiat-e-Talaba, the student wing of Jamaat-e-Islami’s branch in Pakistan. Today he runs a “networking” group for its graduates in the United States.

Ansari frequently promotes JI on his Facebook account, attends JI rallies and events in America, Europe, and Pakistan, and has approvingly shared photos of Jamaat-e-Islami rallies in Pakistan at which the crowds wave placards reading: “Death to Israel. Death to America.”

Ansari also devotes dozens of Facebook posts to praising JI terrorist operatives convicted for their roles in the 1971 mass killings, claiming that the “Pakistani nation will remember these heroes for centuries to come.”

He even boasts of meeting with the son of a JI war criminal, Motiur Rahman Nizami, whom Bangladesh’s International War Crimes Tribunal convicted of genocide, rape, and torture, and who was subsequently executed for his crimes. But Ansari assured his Facebook followers that the war criminal Nizami had been a mujahid [holy warrior] and remains a shaheed [martyr].

Ansari’s social-media accounts are replete with extremist rhetoric and praise for other Islamist causes. He has frequently expressed support for Turkey’s Islamist president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, at one point exclaiming that Erdoğan’s party, the AKP, is in power despite the “power brokers of the world, the liberal anti Muslim media headed by Jews.”

HHRD’s CEO, Raza Farrukh, also openly affiliates with JI. While serving as the head of HHRD, he took pride in meeting with JI’s Pakistani deputy leader Khurshid Ahmad at a meeting in Pakistan organized by HHRD’s partner, Al-Khidmat. Ahmad has previously described the Taliban as “refulgent and splendid” and has written about the “implication of Europe’s being in the clasp of Jews.”

Despite its partnerships with terrorist organizations and its officials’ promotion of extremism, HHRD has long enjoyed non-Muslim support. HHRD reveals that its donors include the British government, the World Food Programme, the World Health Organization, and prominent American corporations such as Microsoft, Cisco, PepsiCo, and Dell.

In 2013, HHRD announced that it had been named one of the “top ten” charities in America. That same year, the U.S. government’s Office of Personnel Management informed HHRD that it would be included on the government’s Combined Federal Campaign list, a workplace-giving program that enables federal-government employees to donate from their salaries to HHRD.

HHRD is not the sole JI organization operating in America. It is just one component of a powerful network of JI groups coordinated by an organization named the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA). ICNA has openly identified itself as a JI organization on a number of occasions. Other ICNA-run organizations include another aid organization named ICNA Relief (formerly run by HHRD chairman Mohsin Ansari) and a youth wing named Young Muslims.

Since ICNA’s founding in 1968, its leaders have included Ashrafuzzaman Khan, who during the 1971 Liberation War in Bangladesh served as commander-in-chief of a JI militia group. In 2013, Bangladesh’s International War Crimes Tribunal found Khan guilty of abducting and murdering 18 Bangladeshi intellectuals. Khan was sentenced to death in abstentia for his role in the genocide.

These ties to war criminals are enduring. In 2016, HHRD chairman and former ICNA Relief head Mohsin Ansari revealed that ICNA and its offshoots were asked to organize funeral prayers for the aforementioned JI war criminal, Motiur Rahman Nizami.

ICNA and its offshoots also promote extremism at home. Its annual symposium in Chicago is one of the largest conferences in the American Muslim calendar. The conference frequently features JI operatives and some of America’s most extreme and bigoted Muslim clerics. ICNA’s youth wing, Young Muslims, operates in mosques all across America and teaches extremist Islamist tracts to Muslim youth.

In spite of its extremist associations, in 2016 ICNA received a grant of over $1.3 million from the Department of Homeland Security. ICNA Relief is also included in the U.S. government’s workplace-giving program. Other JI front groups in Pakistan have secured another $2 million in U.S. government grants since 2013.

There is no doubt that HHRD, ICNA, and their various offshoots are proxies for Jamaat-e-Islami. The U.S. government’s designation of JI’s military wing as a terrorist organization also leaves no doubt that JI is a violent Islamist network. Its front groups in the subcontinent and the West are funding Hamas, working with designated terrorist groups, instilling Islamist ideas in young western Muslims, usurping the leadership of American Muslim communal institutions, and using charitable giving to sanitize JI’s reputation and further its pernicious agenda.

More about Jamaat e Islami’s activities in the West:

Sitting in the United Kingdom, barrister Abdur Razzak, one of the key figures in Jamaat e Islami Bangladesh (JIB) has been spending millions of dollars in hiring lobbyists and even journalists in the US for creating pressure on the ruling party in Bangladesh by branding Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her party, Awami League as “fascists.”

Few months back, Abdur Razzak extended support towards Surendra Kumar Sinha, former chief justice of Bangladesh (now on self-exile) and encouraged him in writing a book mostly filled with lies, with the ulterior agenda of tarnishing the image of civil-military bureaucracy and secular entities in Bangladesh. Soon after that book was launched on, this newspaper had exposed the conspiracy of JIB-Sinha nexus.

It is learnt from credible sources, Mir Quashim Ali, an executed war criminal in Bangladesh has transferred US$ 150 million to barrister Abdur Razzak (weeks before Ali was hanged) for spending towards hiring lobbyists and journalists in the US as well as for assigning any of the notorious killers of Jamaat e Islami in assassinating several key figures in Bangladeshi ruling party and judiciary.

Crucial general election in Bangladesh:

Another general election is scheduled to be held in Bangladesh on December 30, 2018 and there are substantial chances of radical Islamic parties like Jamaat e Islami Bangladesh (JIB) and its political darling Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP)’s returning to power with a landslide victory. Most disturbing fact is, even policymakers of secularist nations like India have already distanced themselves from Awami League and extended silent support towards Bangladesh Nationalist Party and its political associates. According to several surveys conducted by various organizations in Bangladesh and abroad, BNP led coalition is projected getting at least 170 seats in the parliament of 300 seats. This would certainly grant the opportunity to BNP and its political coalition in pushing forward the agenda of Islamization of Bangladesh.

There are more disturbing facts:

Although BNP is known for its Islamist and anti-Semitic ideologies, ruling Awami League (AL) too is no angel. It has recently been inclined towards Hefajat e Islam (HeI), a Qawmi madrassa based organization. AL has implemented a number of decisions at the pressure of HeI which already had been criticized by the secularist forces in Bangladesh. HeI demands enforcement of Sharia rule in Bangladesh, denounces democracy and considers the Western nations as “enemy of Islam.”

AL, BNP, JIB and HeI are notoriously anti-Semitic and heavily inclined towards mega terrorist outfits like Hamas and Iran.

Bangladesh has records of ignoring resolutions of the US Congress:

On 15 February 2007, House Resolution 64 was passed by the United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs without opposition. The resolution, introduced by Representatives Mark Kirk (R-IL) and Nita Lowey (D-NY), called on the government of Bangladesh to drop all charges against me (I was charged with sedition, treason and blasphemy for confronting radical Islam and jihad; for denouncing anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial; for defending Israel; and for promoting interfaith harmony). The vote on the resolution was held on 13 March 2007 and the resolution passed by a vote of 409 to 1, with 4 members voting present.

Although the United States Congress in the aforementioned resolution had asked the Bangladesh authorities to “immediately drop the false charges”, governments in Bangladesh had totally ignored it and even had wrongly convicted me with 9-year’s rigorous imprisonment in the false charges of treason and blasphemy. Appeal against the wrong conviction is still pending hearing with the High Court Division of the Bangladesh Supreme Court.

Furthermore, despite the fact that the United States Congress had asked Bangladesh authorities in compensating me for the harassment through this trumped-up charges – it was equally ignored. Most importantly, I had been wrongly convicted during the tenure of Awami League government that proclaims to be secularist.

Will the HR 1156 have any impact?

With my personal experience, I do not see any hope of any of the political parties – be it Awami League or Bangladesh Nationalist Party – doing anything in stopping the rise of radical Islamic parties or groups like Jamaat e Islam and or Hefajat e Islam in the country. Instead, Hefazat e Islam in particular has been gaining strength under the patronization of the mainstream political parties.

Is Bangladesh heading towards Sharia rule?

Bangladesh may not ever embrace Sharia rule by replacing the democratic system, but of course, with the rise of radical Islamic entities like Jamaat e Islami and Hefajat e Islam, we have reasons to believe that in future, radical Islam will have much influence on any of the ruling parties in the country.

Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury is the editor of Blitz.

Editorial Team

Blitz’s Editorial Board is responsible for the stories published under this byline. This includes editorials, news stories, letters to the editor, and multimedia features on BLiTZ

Click to comment

Leave a Comment

More in News

Subscribe to BLiTZ via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to BLiTZ and receive notifications of new posts by email.


To Top
%d bloggers like this: