On March 28, six assailants traveling in two cars stopped the car of a businessman running a brick kiln on Gorwa Undera Road, pulled him out of the car, badly injured him and looted Rs 1.52 lakh in cash from the car. The court ordered to reject the anticipatory bail applications of accused Kashim Khan Irfan Khan Mohd., Kesar Khan Abrar Khan Pathan and Ghulamnabi Nabi Mohd. Pathan (all three residents of Gorwa) wanted in this crime for the last 25 days.
Other accused are also involved in this incident
Hearing of anticipatory bail application here in the sessions court, advocate KT Gangwani on behalf of the petitioner and advocate Anil M. Desai on behalf of the government gave arguments. After examining the arguments and evidence of both the sides, 8th Additional Sessions Judge Rajendra H. Prajapati pronounced the verdict. In the decision a. Considering the affidavit of the officer, the accused assaulted the complainant with iron pipe and wooden stick, causing grievous injuries including fractures in his hands and feet. Along with this, there is also an allegation of robbery of 1.52 lakhs. The name of the petitioner is also included in the complaint. Thus, the petitioner appears to have played an active role in the commission of the offense of the accused. Other accused are also involved in this incident. In the present situation, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner-accused does not appear to be acceptable and justified.
The present petitioners have been wrongly implicated due to personal enmity.
According to the evidence, the offense has been committed. This is clearly a well-planned conspiracy. If the petitioner-accused are released on anticipatory bail, there is every possibility of tampering with the evidence of the prosecution. It is further noted that it is the submission of the petitioners that the complainant is obstinate and several offenses have been registered against him. The complainant has wrongly implicated the present petitioners out of personal enmity. The investigation of the crime in this regard is still ongoing. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted on the ground that more than one offense has been registered.
