Connect with us

Kamala Harris tells Islamist antisemites what they want to hear

Kamala Harris, Harris, Iron Dome, Israel, George Mason University, Jewish State

Oped

Kamala Harris tells Islamist antisemites what they want to hear

Kamala Harris’s response demonstrated that while she’s not ready to clearly endorse antisemitism and hatred of Israel, the way that radicals like Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and the Squad have done, like Cory Booker and other Democrat lefties, she wants to at least be able to play for both sides, and Jewish Dems, as usual, won’t hold her accountable and will defend her affirmation of antisemitism by arguing that we should pay attention to when she tells Jews what they want to hear, not when she tells Islamist antisemites what they want to hear. Writes Daniel Greenfield

Earlier this week, Kamala Harris spoke to students at George Mason University where a  “part-Yemeni, part-Iranian” student challenged her with the false claims that Israel commits “genocide” and that money is being taken from providing health care to Americans to funding the Iron Dome defense system in Israel.

These two intertwined smears, that Israel’s self-defense against actual genocide is genocidal, and that the Jewish State is taking money from “public healthcare, lack of affordable housing” and “all this money ends up going to inflaming Israel” is a classic antisemitic trope.

Kamala Harris could have dissented from these claims in even a small way, instead she treated the student’s antisemitic rant as if she were the victim of some sort of oppression adding a third antisemitic trope that the student haven’t even really introduced.

“This is about the fact that your voice, your perspective, your experience, your truth should not be suppressed and it must be heard, right?” Kamala argued. “The point that you are making about policy that relates to Middle East policy, foreign policy, we still have healthy debates in our country about what is the right path, and nobody’s voice should be suppressed on that.”

Except whose voice is being suppressed?

The student complained that despite anti-Israel rallies, funding for missile defense in Israel went ahead. Kamala escalated that into suggestions that anti-Israel voices were being “suppressed”.

Who was suppressing them? Those “influential Rabbis” invoked by the New York Times?

This reminds me of the time that Senator Bernie Sanders was ordered to explain his relationship “with your Jewish community” and he responded by declaring his opposition to Israel.

Kamala’s people have played defense by essentially telling everyone to ignore what she said at GMU and pay attention to what she said when addressing Jewish groups. Jewish Dems, whose head Halie Soifer, had worked as Kamala’s national security adviser, responded by dismissing the incident.

“Vice President Kamala Harris recently spoke to a political science class at George Mason University about democracy and voting rights. When a young woman questioned the use of taxpayer money to support Israel, the Vice President told the student that her “voice, perspective, experience, truth should not be suppressed.” This response was consistent with the Vice President’s overall message – that democracy means ensuring all voices are heard.

All voices, really? The voices of Klansmen also? If Kamala had been asked a similar leading question by a student suggesting that…

  1. Asian-Americans were responsible for spreading COVID-19
  2. Black people are lazy criminals
  3. Insert your own trope here

… the response would not have been a sympathetic “your voice, your perspective, your experience, your truth should not be suppressed” affirmation.

Kamala’s response demonstrated that while she’s not ready to clearly endorse antisemitism and hatred of Israel, the way that radicals like Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and the Squad have done, like Cory Booker and other Democrat lefties, she wants to at least be able to play for both sides, and Jewish Dems, as usual, won’t hold her accountable and will defend her affirmation of antisemitism by arguing that we should pay attention to when she tells Jews what they want to hear, not when she tells Islamist antisemites what they want to hear.

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Recommended for you:

Blitz’s Editorial Board is not responsible for the stories published under this byline. This includes editorials, news stories, letters to the editor, and multimedia features on WeeklyBlitz.net

Click to comment

Leave a Comment

More in Oped

Popular Posts

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Top Trends

Facebook

More…

Latest

To Top
%d bloggers like this: