Connect with us

Widespread fear-mongering propaganda centering the pandemic PART-3

Oped

Widespread fear-mongering propaganda centering the pandemic PART-3

Widespread fear-mongering propaganda centering the pandemic PART-3

In the next installment of this serialized article, I will discuss British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s repeated attempts of spreading winds of fear amongst his own people. But now, let me give a statistic on the rate of recovery of the Covid-19 patients below:

Age group Percentage of recovery
0-19 99.997 percent
20-49 99.98 percent
50-69 99.50 percent
70+ 94.60 percent

The above statistic on 5.40 death rate of people above 70 years of age includes the people on their death bed dying of something else, even if they are 105 years old, and still, 94.6 percent of the people survive.

Numbers don’t lie. You can run to people who work for the pharmaceutical companies, they will scare you – if that is your wish. You can run to liberal websites and the Liberal Media, and they will lie to you and tell you to be very afraid.  People have many motives to lie to you. Just remember, while Covid-19 is a matter of concern to the majority of the people, it is a grand bonanza for pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and even those working in the UN organizations. To them, this is a business – an opportunity of making tons of money.

The death rate you really want to know is how many healthy people have died of COVID-19.  Well, whatever number CNN or other media outlets tell you only, 6 percent of that are healthy people.  You heard me right!  Over 94 percent of the media’s death rate is fear-mongering because they were not healthy people.  Remember, 94 percent had a pre-existing condition and that is a fact.  If a liberal fact check says otherwise, they are tricking you and lying.  They will say false, but if you click and read why they say false, you will find out I am right.  They will actually confirm the statistics.

Only 6 percent of all Covid-19 deaths are people without any pre-existing conditions. Those are the people considered healthy – but died. This does not even mean that the 6 percent were in good health. They just never were diagnosed with a condition. They may have had a health issue that they never knew about. That means, the 6 percent death rate is actually the worst-case scenario and is most likely even lower than 6 percent.

If the media says two million people died of Covid-19, remember only 120,000 were healthy people. The rest of them are people with preexisting health conditions. Talk about fear-mongering. Why the media aren’t telling this if their intention is not fear-mongering?

On August 8, 2020, The New York Times published a report saying potentially 90 percent of those who have tested positive for COVID-19 have such insignificant amounts of the virus present in their bodies that such individuals do not need to isolate nor are they candidates for contact tracing.

And now about the mask. So-called health experts are barking continuously stating wearing masks can save people from getting infected to Covid-19. The reality is just the opposite.

Let us know, the size of the Covid-19 particle is 0.125 microns, while that of smoke is 0.3~.07 microns and human hair is 75.0 microns. This means we need to split a human hair 600 times lengthwise to get to the virus particle size. Can’t human hair pass through the mask we are wearing? If the answer is yes then my question is – is it not very easy for the Covid-19 virus to penetrate into the masks?

And, do we know – 85 percent of the people getting Covid-19 are mask wearers? According to statistics, amongst those who got Covid-19 infected – 70.6 percent had always used masks while 14.40 percent did it often and 3.9 percent never. That means, 85 percent of the people getting Covid-19 are regular mask wearers.

Let us not forget, disposable medical masks (also known as surgical masks) are loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds and to protect the wearer against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids.

There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure.

To be continued …

Recommended for you:

An internationally acclaimed multi-award-winning anti-militancy journalist, research-scholar, counter-terrorism specialist, and editor of Blitz. Follow his on Twitter Salah_Shoaib

Click to comment

Leave a Comment

More in Oped

Advertisement

Popular Posts

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Top Trends

Facebook

More…

Latest

To Top
%d bloggers like this: