In addition to Europe, now the US is also joining the global wave of anti-NATO protests. Writes Lucas Leiroz
Increasingly, citizens of Western countries are expressing their discontent with NATO’s irresponsible war policy. In the US, street protests and internet pro-peace conferences have become more and more frequent. In fact, as the international situation worsens, it seems clear that ordinary people in the West are no longer supporting the measures taken by their leaders, demanding greater responsibility in the conduct of foreign policy.
In addition to Europe, now the US is also joining the global wave of anti-NATO protests. On January 14, the streets of New York were taken over by hundreds of demonstrators dissatisfied with the belligerence of the Biden government, demanding an immediate end to Washington’s war campaign against Russia. The rallies emerged as a response to the recent US government initiative to send new packages of Patriot surface-to-air missile systems to Ukraine.
In fact, people react to the government’s actions mostly because of the social crisis that the country is going through. With historical inflation, unemployment, polarization and the migration crisis, Joe Biden’s priority of spending billions of dollars to help a neo-Nazi regime on another continent obviously becomes a problem. For ordinary Americans, geopolitical rivalries and projects for world order are of little significance. What really matters is the welfare of the people and social stability. Therefore, if maintaining a proxy war against Russia hinders this welfare and damages citizens’ living conditions, the best thing to do is to end interventionism, leaving Moscow and Kiev to resolve the conflict alone.
Recent protests have been organized by members of different political organizations. One of the main ones is the ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism), a coalition that brings together social activists from various political ideologies to demand the end of the wars promoted by the US around the world. In this sense, Brian Becker, national director of the ANSWER Coalition gave an interview to Chinese news agency Xinhua about the event on the 14th, commenting:
“We’re here today because we oppose the endless expansion of NATO, which is not only unnecessary but reckless and proactive (…) We’re also here today because the United States is spending extra 65 billion U.S. dollars to fund war in Ukraine while there are a million homeless people in America, while our schools are underfunded and many people are going into bankruptcy because they can’t pay doctors’ bills”.
Furthermore, the virtual world has also been used as an important ally of pro-peace activists to demand changes in American foreign policy. In parallel with the street demonstrations, anti-war groups have maintained strong activity on social media, organizing web conferences to expose critical opinions of NATO and propose changes in the current scenario.
For example, the Schiller Institute, an important pro-peace organization that operates in the US and Europe, organized the conference “Resurrect the True Mission of Dr. Martin Luther King: Stop NATO’s World War” on the same day as the demonstrations, bringing together social activists, American politicians and veterans in support of a radical change in American foreign policy.
The purpose of the event was to instigate reflections on the memory of the important American pacifist Martin Luther King, whose day is celebrated on January 16, by analyzing the current world situation. There is no doubt among analysts that the world is currently going through the period of greatest military instability of all times, with serious risks of global and nuclear escalation in the proxy conflict waged by NATO against Russia. In this sense, American pro-peace organizations expose the need to reflect on the necessary ways to honor the memory of the pacifist heroes and prevent the global situation from getting out of control.
In fact, pro-peace activism in the US exposes a strong geopolitical awareness, as the groups involved in the protests recognize that the current war is waged by NATO against Moscow, with the path to peace being possible only through a revision of its plans on the part of Washington. In this sense, more and more American citizens seem to understand that it will only be possible to avoid a large-scale world conflict if NATO is “stopped”.
The never-ending expansion of the Atlantic military alliance is seen with increasing antipathy among American and European citizens. Residents of western countries, despite all the propaganda to which they are exposed by the big media outlets, are realizing in practice the real effects of a bellicose policy: high living costs, social instability and the constant threat of nuclear escalation. The “war is profit” mentality does not apply to the ordinary people, only to a small group of leaders of the military-industrial complex, who do not represent popular interests.
The tendency is for protests and conferences like the ones on the 14th to become increasingly common. At some point, to prevent social chaos, Western governments will have to meet the demands for peace made by their citizens – otherwise, the crisis of legitimacy could have catastrophic effects.