American “Queen of experiments” Madonna has been accused of running child trafficking under the garb of her orphanage named ‘Raising Malawi’ and the woke icon’s exploitation of Malawian authority and its most vulnerable children. Recently the Ethiopian World Federation has gone to Malawi’s President President Lazarus Chakwera in order to ask that he investigates “homosexual and transgender allegations over the adoption of the Malawian children for possible ‘human trafficking and social experiments”.
According to media reports, the Ethiopian World Federation, which has since transformed into a global diaspora organization, is asking that President Lazarus Chakwera restrict Madonna and her associate’s “accessibility to Africa and to African children as precautionary measure until a thorough investigation is done into child trafficking, sex exploitation, sexual slavery, adoption reversal, threat of coercion, fraud, deception and abuse of power or vulnerability”.
The principle of “innocent until proven guilty” should be remembered in this case, but there are undeniable facts to consider regarding Madonna which render her unsuitable to be around children, let alone to be given opportunity to influence them.
The Ethiopian World Federation petition states of Madonna that the “psychology behind her ability to release child pornography, religious imagery, bestiality and vulgar pornography has prompted her to open an orphanage in Malawi named ‘Raising Malawi’ in 2006 to host social experiments on vulnerable African children in Malawi”.
The Federation quotes Malawi Penal Code that provides in Section 137A: “Indecent practices between females. Any female person who, whether in public or private, commits any act of gross indecency with another female person, or procures another female person to commit any act of gross indecency with her, or attempts to procure the commission of any such act by any female person with herself or with another female person, whether in public or private, shall be guilty of an offense and shall be liable to imprisonment for five years”.
The petition makes references to a book that Madonna wrote in 1992 called ‘SEX’, which “features adult content including softcore pornography and simulations of sexual acts including sadomasochism (the derivation of sexual gratification from the infliction of physical pain or humiliation either on another person or on oneself)”.
“Gay porn stars were photographed in pornographic pictures with Madonna performing vulgar sex acts with the same sex which should have been disclosed during her adoption case in 2006 in Lilongwe, Malawi.
“Madonna had to sign a contract that forbade the book from including images of child pornography, bestiality, or religious imagery. Shortly after signing that agreement, Madonna founded a company called Maverick, a partnership with Time Warner.
“She now holds total artistic control over any work released by Maverick, who is now the book’s publisher. The agreement she signed with Time Warner with the sexually explicit content in the book Sex was null and void”.
Madonna is being accused of using David Banda “for sexual exploitation and social experiments today”. Pictures are awash on social media of David Banda wearing female clothes, makeup and wearing earrings — whilst the two holding hands like two lovers.
The organization further says Justice Fiona Mwale, who presided over the adoption application, is alleged to have made “a series of harsh questioning of [Madonna’s] motives” – and quotes the Judge as saying in her judgement: “In determining her motives, I questioned the petitioner at length about the impact of her decision which could be construed as robbing Malawi of its most precious resource, its children”.
“We firmly believe that Malawi has been robbed of its most precious resource – its children,” contends Ethiopian World Federation. “In 2013, the country accused Madonna of ‘bullying’ state officials and making diva demands – and of citing her Raising Malawi charity as the reason for doing so.
“After another appeal, the Supreme Court granted Madonna the right to adopt her second child from Malawi, Mercy James. In 2017, Malawi granted the singer permission to adopt again, and she became mother to twin baby girls Esther and Stella Mwale.
“After careful review and facts presented regarding the psychological, physical and mental abuse of African children on January 11, 2018, the US Embassy in Addis Ababa confirmed that Ethiopian Parliament passed new legislation banning adoptions by foreigners on January 9, 2018.
“In 2019, nearly 70 percent of human trafficking victims in the US were identified as either being sex trafficked, or victims of both forced labor and sexual exploitation.
“The High Court recently stated that 25 million people worldwide are not afforded their fundamental right to freedom; however, the International Labor Organization estimates the number of human trafficking victims to be approximately 40 million”, said the petitioners – citing the link.
The petition also accused the government of Malawi of failing “to do a complete social background check on the adoptive parent” and they have reason to believe that Madonna “is using these children as a social experiment in response to the heavy LGBTQ community push for sodomy in America”.
“We, the global diaspora, the Black People of the World at the Ethiopian World Federation, Incorporated are concerned that the integrity of Africa and the cultural traditions should be preserved, not exploited or discredited.
“In 2013, Malawi accused Madonna of exaggerating her contributions to the impoverished country and unreasonably demanding special treatment during a tour there and Madonna has used social media to discredit the culture and policies that Malawi has in place to protect our children globally”.
It may be mentioned here that few years ago Madonna boasted that her son whom she adopted from Malawi looks better in her clothes than she does. This was the center of controversy back in 2006 in barging into the East African country (in a private jet to boot), “stepping outside of normal procedures”, and using her fame, money and “privilege” to gain access to Malawi’s orphanages and adopt Malawian children.
At that time, the Human Rights Consultative Committee (HRCC) filed a motion “to ensure that Madonna’s adoption procedure followed the letter of the law”. But that could not stop the American “Queen of experiments”, because Madonna felt that she was above the law and found a way to maneuver outside the Malawi laws.
It may be added here that the ‘Adoption of Children Act’, which governs Malawi, is intended to apply equally to anyone considering adoption, regardless of status and income. As one children’s rights advocate put it: “Procedures are there to ensure that we reduce incidences of children being trafficked, to reduce the incidences of children being separated from their parents…This is why we have rules.” And now Madonna is being investigated for those very “incidences”.
Ironically, Madonna claims to advance black rights. She was an avid supporter and participant in the Black Lives Matter protests of 2020, even attending a demonstration on crutches as she recovered from an injury.
The Black Lives Matter movement, notorious for its presence around the George Floyd hoopla, has a much broader focus, including the rejection of Israel as an “imperialist project”, “disruption of the Western-prescribed nuclear family”, an emphasis on colonialism, and an obsession with “white privilege”.
Despite Madonna’s advocacy for black rights, she proceeded without caution to barge into Malawi and bully her way into establishing an orphanage. It has now been seventeen years since Madonna landed in Malawi to “rescue” Malawian children. Madonna is known for her outrageous publicity stunts and stunts and self-serving behavior.
While Madonna is now being investigated for the horrors of exploiting and corrupting black children in Malawi, the usual voices that are quick to levy charges of racism, colonialism, white privilege and the like are notably silent.
Recently, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who has been smeared by Leftist ideologues as a “far-right fascist”, slammed France for exploiting African children, particularly in the gold mining industry, and its hypocritical welcoming of African migrants.
The double standards of the mainstream media and of the far-Left anti-racism industry is stark. The real victims continue to be ignored, while those who call out abuses are silenced. Victims including African children, women abused under the Sharia, Nigerian Christians ravaged by genocide, women who have been exploited by transgender men in sports and raped by men who identify as women, are being systematically ignored.
Back in February 2017, the South China Morning Post in a report titled ‘Will Madonna’s latest Malawi adoptions fuel child-trafficking?’ wrote: Experts are divided on the impact of Madonna’s adoption of four-year-old twins from Malawi, saying it could fuel child trafficking in Africa or provide relief to the country’s overcrowded orphanages.
On Tuesday, Malawi’s High Court granted the 58-year-old U.S. singer permission to adopt the girls, following her adoption in 2006 and 2009 of two other children, David Banda and Mercy James.
“We are really putting our children in a big danger”, said Maxwell Matewere, who heads Eye of the Child, a children’s advocacy charity in Malawi.
Earlier in July 2009, Lisa Lovatt-Smith, in response to an article titled ‘Madonna, Mercy and Malawi: her fight to adopt a second African child’ wrote an opinion editorial titled ‘Madonna should not have been allowed to adopt Mercy’, where she said:
For professionals arguing for ethical responsibility in inter-country adoption, Madonna’s successful appeal to adopt four-year-old Mercy James was a heavy blow (Madonna and child, 12 June). As the founder of OrphanAid Africa, I have lived in a small village in Ghana for seven years. We believe that poverty is not a reason to separate children from their families. We provide cash grants to poor families so that they can afford to care for their children and are not forced to send them to orphanages just to ensure food and education.
Jacques Peretti, the author of your article, says that, because of her largesse, poor Malawians practically worship Madonna: “Her name … has mutated into ‘Ma Donor’: the Giver.” However, Madonna alone cannot “save from poverty” any country: that would involve important economic structural reform, in which she has not invested. Esme Chombo, the provincial judge, was right when she ruled that the adoption was unlawful, and she “was scornful of western attitudes towards Malawian poverty … and [defended] the existing law, protecting these children from trafficking”.
I am not against inter-country adoption. Many professionals believe it is a good solution for abandoned children with no family, or those who are unlikely be adopted locally. But Mercy has a family – a grandmother and a father – and being in an orphanage may reflect poverty more than abandonment. You report a local journalist saying: “When children like Mercy are left in orphanages by families, it is often because the families simply can’t cope for a period of time. The understanding of the families is that they will take the kids back”.
Mercy’s grandmother, Lucy Chekechiwa, had originally resisted the adoption. But, as you report: “However tough Lucy has been in resisting Madonna, Madonna has been tougher … no one tells Madonna she cannot have what she wants. And now … Lucy caved in.” Can we please spare a thought as to how Lucy feels today? Having delivered Mercy, watched Mercy’s mother die a few days later from complications after the birth, and cared for the child to the best of her ability, Lucy doesn’t know if she will see her granddaughter again…
